Author: Rex
Date: 09:44:49 10/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2001 at 09:02:05, Chessfun wrote: >On October 26, 2001 at 08:42:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 26, 2001 at 08:03:46, Rex wrote: >> >>>GT-2(Modified) finds it in just .4 on a 1.533Ghz machine. >>> >>> >>> >>>00:00:00.5 1.50 8 154240 Qa1 Qe8 Rxa7 Rc8 >>>00:00:00.4 1.58 8 240957 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 >>>00:00:01.3 1.68 9 463033 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 >>>00:00:02.9 1.76 10 870326 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 >> >>I see based on the output that after 0.5 seconds tiger wanted to play Qa1 and if >>this output is truth then it is clear that tiger did not solve it in 0.4 >>seconds. >> >>It is clear that at least one of the numbers 0.4 and 0.5 is wrong. >> >>Based on the number of nodes it seems clear that the 0.4 is wrong and >>1.3*(240957/463033) is a better estimate. >> >>Another possible estimate is 0.5+(1.3-0.5)*(240957-154240)/(463033-154240) >> >>Uri > >Here are a couple of Gambit 2.0 hits. >1.4 ghz, 96 mb hash. > >Gambit 2.0 aggressive w/anti-human. >00:00:00.2 1.50 8 144795 Qa1 Qe8 Rxa7 Rc8 Qa5 Qd8 b6 cxb6 Rxb6 Rcxc6 Rxc6 Qxa5 >Rxa5 Rxc6 Nxe5 Nxe5 >00:00:00.6 1.58 8 221240 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Rb1 Rb8 Rxb8 Qxb8 Qa1 Rg6 >00:00:01.3 1.68 9 460133 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa1 Rd3 Rxa7 Rxa7 Qxa7 >00:00:02.5 1.78 10 800718 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rd1+ Kh2 Kh8 Rxa7 Rxa7 Qxa7 >00:00:03.1 1.92 11 1518916 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rd1+ Kh2 Rb8 Rxb8 Qxb8 Rxa7 >00:00:08.1 2.18 12 3317465 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rc8 Rb7 Rdxc6 Rxc6 Rxc6 Nxe5 >Rf6 Rc7 >00:00:28.6 2.40 13 10967755 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Rb7 Rd1+ Kh2 Qxa3 Rxa3 Nd8 Rd7 Rc1 >Nxe5 Rc2 Rf3 Ne6 > >Gambit 2.0 suicidal w/anti-human. >00:00:00.7 1.66 8 166374 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Rb7 Rd1+ Kh2 Qxa3 Rxa3 Nd6 Raxa7 Rxa7 >Rxa7 >00:00:00.9 1.68 9 298794 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa1 Rd3 Rxa7 Rxa7 Qxa7 >00:00:01.1 1.76 10 614897 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rd1+ Kh2 Qc5 Rxa7 Rf8 Rbb7 >00:00:03.8 1.96 11 1306678 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rd1+ Kh2 Kh8 c7 Nd6 Rb4 Qe8 >Rxa7 Rxa7 Qxa7 >00:00:07.2 2.24 12 2976927 b6 cxb6 Rbxb6 Qf8 Qa2 Rd1+ Kh2 Kh8 c7 Nd6 Nxe5 f3 Rb8 >Rxb8 cxb8Q Qxb8 gxf3 > >Sarah. Thanks Sarah for the confirmations..Pretty darn close.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.