Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 13:22:26 10/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2001 at 12:53:27, Gordon Rattray wrote: >On October 26, 2001 at 11:51:15, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On October 26, 2001 at 11:48:44, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>Click here to watch the games: >>>http://users.cybercity.dk/~dsl53055/live/index.html >>> >>>T-bird 900 Mhz, 384MB (not 512 as it says) ram, win2k. >>>Ponder=off >>>64MB hash for both engines >>>Fritz 7: with: Fritz7.ctg >>>Deep Fritz with: 2600.ctg >>>40/40+40/40+40 >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >>By the way, these games are without TB's so we can get a picture of the endgame >>strenght. >>Fritz 7 v Shredder 5.32 was also without TB's. >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Firstly, thanks for running these matches. > >Why not get an idea of endgame strength while using TBs? I can't say for sure, >but if I was a program author (I'm not), I may try to improve the endgame play >while assuming that a certain set of TBs will be present (e.g. all 4 man). >Maybe this is a poor assumption, but I think that programmers may not be able to >optimise their engines for both cases (time/effort involved). And I think most >serious users will use TBs. Just a thought. > >Gordon No problem Gordon :) I wanted to see the engines respective endgame strength's/weaknesses without the influence of TB's and it looks like Uri has found the first interesting move, a bad one from Fritz 7 aginst Shredder 5.32 in the last of 10 games. http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?194283 This link will take you to Uri's post on this. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.