Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 15:53:53 10/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2001 at 18:41:49, José Carlos wrote: >On October 26, 2001 at 17:05:06, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On October 26, 2001 at 16:56:19, Derek Mauro wrote: >> >>>As far as I can tell, static and global variables seem to be equally efficient, >>>the only difference being that statics have a limited scope. Am I right, or is >>>one actually more efficient than the other? Is there any advantage to passing >>>around a static or a global? I've always read that globals should be avoided. >>>Is there any performance reason why? >>> >>>Thanks for your help in advance. >> >>I assume you mean static -> local. (?) > > Nope. Static are local variables that last after the function has ended, and >are still there when the function is called again. Ooooh, right. Yeah, they're the same. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.