Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 12:11:20 10/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2001 at 04:23:42, Uri Blass wrote: >I understand that thorsten is interested in the total number of nodes in a fixed >time and not in the number of nodes per second that is displayed by the >computer. > >He does not use the computer clock but an external clock when he trusts the >total number of nodes that is displayed by the computer. exactly. at least one guy understand me :-)) >If I understand correctly in your example 54 Mhz is really slightly faster than >30 Mhz but 54 Mhz is too much and you can use 32 Mhz to get the same total >number of nodes when you use external clock. >Uri i do not think ct adds the average NPS in the total number. IMO it adds the REAL computed N and adds them. or is christophe telling us the NPS is added each "second" in the total. i would not program it this way. he maybe has done. this would of course explain our misunderstanding. my palm says it makes more total nodes in an amount xyz stopped with an external clock. therefore i do use it at 54 mhz. i see no reason to stop this. why should LESS nodes be faster or as fast ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.