Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 10:52:35 05/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 1998 at 12:42:57, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>Dear Mr. Enrique Irazoqui. > >Dear Mr. Czub :) >> I was asked to give some examples of WEAK >>play of fritz. I have given an example. >>It is - an example. Not more. not less. >>1. I understand that you are not interested in games. >You understand badly. >I quit as an Economist when I was 28 years old... Maybe the economist is still in you. 28 years do stamp a person. >Like all programs. I post below a couple of CST losses, a marvelous >example of silly fireworks that end up exploding on the author. :) >Which proves? Let's try again: all programs make mistakes. Some more >than others... :) You don't even understand the sense of posting chess games. If somebody asks me to post examples, and I do so, you do believe i want to prove that fritz makes mistakes ??? No - this is not the reason I do so. >Because, as I said before and as we all know, all programs play silly >moves sometimes. People do too, by the way. As I said, you don't understand. If ALL programs play silly moves from time to time, than we should stop competition enrique. Or stop posting and replaying games. Because when ANY program makes mistakes, and you have this point of view, discussing or replaying games makes no sense. Programming makes no sense. Your point is: any society murders children from time to time. Any atomic power-station does leak radiation from time to time. And therefore an example is not interesting. Or does not count. Only your numbers count. And they show: transporting castor or having nuclear power stations is no problem because your statistic says: an accident does only happen any 40.000 years. So your statistic says, and therefore nobody should discuss about it. he ?! Thats not my way. I am not interested in statistics saying an accident only takes place any 40.000 years. I don't want these risky technology and the transport, and therefore show examples where these technique fails. And your explanation or answer is: any chess program makes mistakes, from time to time. How wise enrique. AMEN. With explanations like this you can give up computerchess. Cause these sentences do always fit the context.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.