Author: John Merlino
Date: 10:46:15 10/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2001 at 13:36:08, Alan Grotier wrote: >Here's hoping everyone does not run for the door when whish list is mentioned. > >As we all know present chess engines can just about trounce everybody. >But for the initiated and passionate few,stronger engines are not desired by >those who are genuinely interessed in the game of chess,who like to play chess >and who want to progress. > >By these comments I do not mean stop the strength progress.On the contrary, >I can easely see that developments in this area could lead to insights >elswere : better games at lower strengths for example. > >By all means let's have very strong programs: mais "de grâce" progammers >gives us,the less gifted,the opportunity to progress. > >Chess Master is a perfect example of how to cater to those under 2000 ELO. >We need more of this TYPE of program. >CM analysis presentation is much better because it gives not only who's winning >and loosing,but in addition what has been accomplished.Eg better pawn struture, >better mobility etc.And it can present this if required with the spoken word. >This type of flexibilty is what we need. > >If it is any encouragement to those who design chess engines I have improved >200 Elo thanks to you. > >I enjoy chess but I want to understand why I loose. >More importantly I want to win! On behalf of the Chessmaster team, many thanks for your kind words. Hopefully you'll like the next version even more! jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.