Author: Ron Langeveld
Date: 13:14:31 10/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2001 at 14:28:12, Slater Wold wrote: >On October 28, 2001 at 13:48:01, John Merlino wrote: > >>On October 28, 2001 at 13:43:31, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On October 28, 2001 at 13:36:09, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On October 28, 2001 at 13:28:37, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>That *might* be the worst move ever. >>>>> >>>>>And they expect this thing to beat Kramnik? Geez.... >>>> >>>>If they, refer's to Chessbase, I don't think I've ever >>>>read they expect it to beat Kramnik. ;-) >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Ha! Comparing it to Deeper Blue says otherwise. >>> >>>I don't think they have ever said, "..we will beat Kramnik..", but if they >>>didn't think they had a chance why would they play at all? >> >>Making it this far makes it easier for them to say they have the strongest chess >>engine available. This (I would assume) generates sales. >> >>I'm sure that's the main reasons for the whole thing -- advertising and >>exposure. >> >>jm > >I just don't think Fritz 7 (on an 8 way box) getting its butt whooped by Kramnik >is that impressive. It is exposure, but it's not going to get me to buy it. > >Seeing moves like this from Fritz 7 is what's going to make my mind up. Every engine has bugs, even your favourite one. Yet you still bought it. I'm not a big fan of Fritz, but your post simply begs for some relativity. Ron
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.