Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: example for stupid/weak Fritz5, pgn-game

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 13:54:26 05/29/98

Go up one level in this thread


On May 29, 1998 at 16:11:12, blass uri wrote:
>Fritz5 did not do a big tactical mistake
>18...Nxe4 is a mistake but this mistake is typical to computer programs
>Genius3 also need some minutes in order not to do this mistake.
>It is a good test position for computers.

:-)))

I thought you always prove :-))) with your FRITZ FINDS POSITION XYZ
FASTER
that fritz is good in tactics ? Ok - maybe this is also not true.
I am sure it is not true :-))

A finder is good in FINDING the key - move, but that does not say it is
good in tactics at all. As we see from the game.


>18...Rd8 (genius3) or 18...Qc5 (by fritz5 after a long time-near 20
>minutes)
>were probably better.

>>But look yourself. Also the endgame was
>>weak. More games following soon.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.