Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dutch Open impressions

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 07:43:35 10/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On October 29, 2001 at 10:29:26, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 29, 2001 at 04:05:08, Tony Werten wrote:
>
>>On October 28, 2001 at 21:06:11, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On October 28, 2001 at 18:20:43, Bas Hamstra wrote:
>>>
>>>>Again many bizar events. While discussing how boring and anti-positional Tiger
>>>>usually plays, with Jeroen Noomen, during the game Tao-CT, CT shot a h-pawn
>>>>through Tao's left eye. End of discussion. Well, let's call the thing an
>>>>idiot-savant, that's as far as I can go. Newcomer is EEC that does not use any
>>>>form of AlphaBeta at all. The author tried to explain the concept to me, but I'm
>>>>not sure I understand. Each move it plays a couple of shallow "matches" against
>>>>itsself and some kind of pattern matching is involved. Eventually that leads to
>>>>"votes" for different moves. The author says it has won some Blitz games against
>>>>GNU.
>>>>
>>>>Also new is "Gadget" from Hans Zijdenbos, written in Basic. Since it is brand
>>>>new, it has many things *not*. It has no hashtable, no pondering, no nullmove
>>>>and believe it or not, no quiescence search. Very little evaluation. Now can
>>>>that play chess? Amazingly, it does. Imagine Gadget searching 6-7 ply and Tao
>>>>12-13 ply, basically twice as deep. Yet it kept Tao negative for over twenty
>>>>moves, with sound play. Cock de Gorter said the same happened during
>>>>Crafty-Gadget. You would almost expect non nullmovers find positional holes in
>>>>the  nullmove search or something.
>>>>
>>>>During a deep technical discussion with Johan de Koning whether to analyze mates
>>>>and countermates in the evaluation function or not, Jeroen Noomen drops by:
>>>>"aha, a rabbit". Apparently an enemy knight at h7, that can't move, is a rabbit.
>>>>We didn't get it, what do rabbits usually do? We could think of two things: a)
>>>>multiply and b) disappear in a hole. Since there were no minor promotions
>>>>possible in the foreseeable future and the rabbit finally disappeared in h7 I
>>>>wouldn't be surprised if b) has something to do with it.
>>>>
>>>>Well, Tao scored 3 out of 6 so far, on a PIII-500. Should have won against Ant,
>>>>which was positionally manoevred into a corner quite nicely, but alas, fell into
>>>>the "impotent pair" trap which I have no code for: bishop+unpromotable pawn, and
>>>>it became a draw.
>>>>
>>>>Finally: what's the matter with Crafty? It has the fastest hardware of all, but
>>>>seems to do relatively poorly, what's the matter? The new SE stuff, or what?
>>>>
>>>>TooTheLoo,
>>>>Bas.
>>>
>>>1.  Does Crafty _really_ have the fastest hardware there?  That's hard to
>>>believe with lots of 1.4 gig Dual AMD machines cheaply available.  But in any
>>>case, it is possible.  A dual 1.4 is faster than a quad-700 for Crafty, however,
>>>as the quad loses a bit more to overhead...
>>
>>Crafty doesn't have the fastest hardware but it's still quite fast. In the
>>endgame Crafty - XiniX I was outsearching Crafty several times by 3 to 5 ply on
>>a celeron 700 ! Unfortunately it wasn't enough to win, but it does seem to
>>indicate something is wrong in Crafty's endgame. XiniX had no problem searching
>>the same depth.
>>
>>Tony
>>
>>>
>
>
>I don't think the bug shows up like that.  If there is a bug at all.  Are you
>using the 3-4-5 piece EGTBs?  That definitely affects the search speed.
>Otherwise, no ideas here...

Yes. I probe 3-4-5 tables from disk in the search (not in quiescence ) XiniX was
not faster than Crafty in nps (but 4 times slower). In the positions the
branchingfactor is so small that 20 plies should not be a problem.

Tony

>
>
>
>>>2.  Crafty may well have a serious bug.  Michel has reported that it will crash
>>>on a deep think, which is odd.  There is no SE code in it, but it is possible
>>>that something in recent versions has left a bad array subscript or something.
>>>I am trying to get it to repeat a crash, but so far, nothing...
>>>
>>> y



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.