Author: Gordon Rattray
Date: 14:33:55 10/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2001 at 16:45:35, Torstein Hall wrote: >On October 29, 2001 at 14:43:50, Gordon Rattray wrote: > >>On October 29, 2001 at 13:49:18, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote: >> >>>I will hold too, i was disapoint when see much bugs in Fritz 6 and i dont want >>>the same again, >>> >>>Thanks for the info, >>> >>>Manuel >> >> >>Me too. I'm not just jumping on the bandwagon; I'm fed up having to use service >>packs for something that should be better quality in the first place. I can >>accept subtle bugs, but fundamental functionality not working isn't what I pay >>for. >> >>Many of us like chess programs that play strong chess. However, it's time that >>Chessbase realised that there's more to a chess program than just playing >>strength. >> >>Gordon > >I agree that bugs in programs are bad and iritating, but I think CB realise that >its more to a chessprogram than the strength. In my view they have a superior >userinterface to any other chessprogram I know. And I think they have invested >quite a bit of work in it. But as in most other complex programs there are bugs >in the first versions. Agreed, that's why I said "I can accept *subtle* bugs". But I don't think this issue was raised due to subtle bugs. I just get the impression that they've not done enough GUI testing. When I bought Junior6 I couldn't even use the "Full Analysis" functionality without installing a service pack. Would you release software of such quality? Gordon > >Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.