Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kasparov vs Deep Blue, DIEP not as bad as DeepBlue

Author: Joshua Lee

Date: 11:49:32 10/30/01

Go up one level in this thread


Few So Called "Perfect Games" Exist but According to Some GM's They DO. But To
my Main Point Of intrest I know that Some People will Say Deep Blue Is Not as
Good As Deep Fritz and Vice Versa But What i would like to know is that if Deep
Blue Had Extra Knowledge Like Hiarcs/Shredder/ChessTiger   But Even More SO  how
Could It be Possible to Compare The Two (without The Still In existence Deep
Blue Junior) Playing??   I have seen Posts here about DB Jr. Following a game on
ICC within the past few years Maybe someone can shed light on this.

Also why hasn't anyone contacted the DB team and talked with them or got them to
talk here on the messageboard?

I would Like to See One Day before i die an equal Match weather that means A
commercial Program Having the Hardware to search 200MPS or Whatever they were
ACTUALLY searching or The Knowledge that DB is Supposed to Have that the Newest
Programs Don't.

In that case any analysis of Deep Blue Games Should Be with 36Billion Nodes
searched else you don't give an accurate picture......Deep Blue might just have
looked at the move Shredder or Deep Fritz thinks is better but Found a Bust
after more time. Hence the reason it didn't play the so Called Better Move that
you found with you're PC.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.