Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 12:30:44 10/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2001 at 17:33:55, Gordon Rattray wrote: >On October 29, 2001 at 16:45:35, Torstein Hall wrote: > >>On October 29, 2001 at 14:43:50, Gordon Rattray wrote: >> >>>On October 29, 2001 at 13:49:18, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote: >>> >>>>I will hold too, i was disapoint when see much bugs in Fritz 6 and i dont want >>>>the same again, >>>> >>>>Thanks for the info, >>>> >>>>Manuel >>> >>> >>>Me too. I'm not just jumping on the bandwagon; I'm fed up having to use service >>>packs for something that should be better quality in the first place. I can >>>accept subtle bugs, but fundamental functionality not working isn't what I pay >>>for. >>> >>>Many of us like chess programs that play strong chess. However, it's time that >>>Chessbase realised that there's more to a chess program than just playing >>>strength. >>> >>>Gordon >> >>I agree that bugs in programs are bad and iritating, but I think CB realise that >>its more to a chessprogram than the strength. In my view they have a superior >>userinterface to any other chessprogram I know. And I think they have invested >>quite a bit of work in it. But as in most other complex programs there are bugs >>in the first versions. > > >Agreed, that's why I said "I can accept *subtle* bugs". But I don't think this >issue was raised due to subtle bugs. I just get the impression that they've not >done enough GUI testing. > >When I bought Junior6 I couldn't even use the "Full Analysis" functionality >without installing a service pack. Would you release software of such quality? > >Gordon I have to admit that it is suprising that such obvious errors get into release versions! Where are the beta testers? Perhaps they need to fire them and get someone who actually tests the functions in the programs! Torstein > >> >>Torstein
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.