Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:32:51 10/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2001 at 14:49:32, Joshua Lee wrote: >Few So Called "Perfect Games" Exist but According to Some GM's They DO. But To >my Main Point Of intrest I know that Some People will Say Deep Blue Is Not as >Good As Deep Fritz and Vice Versa But What i would like to know is that if Deep >Blue Had Extra Knowledge Like Hiarcs/Shredder/ChessTiger But Even More SO how >Could It be Possible to Compare The Two (without The Still In existence Deep >Blue Junior) Playing?? I have seen Posts here about DB Jr. Following a game on >ICC within the past few years Maybe someone can shed light on this. > >Also why hasn't anyone contacted the DB team and talked with them or got them to >talk here on the messageboard? All you have to do is think for a minute to answer _that_ question. There is nothing they could say that would appease the anti-deepblue crowd. They would simply be drowned in a sea of insults. It happened on r.g.c.c... it would happen here. > >I would Like to See One Day before i die an equal Match weather that means A >commercial Program Having the Hardware to search 200MPS or Whatever they were >ACTUALLY searching or The Knowledge that DB is Supposed to Have that the Newest >Programs Don't. > >In that case any analysis of Deep Blue Games Should Be with 36Billion Nodes >searched else you don't give an accurate picture......Deep Blue might just have >looked at the move Shredder or Deep Fritz thinks is better but Found a Bust >after more time. Hence the reason it didn't play the so Called Better Move that >you found with you're PC. agreed...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.