Author: Albert Silver
Date: 19:39:06 10/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2001 at 11:35:58, James T. Walker wrote:
>On October 30, 2001 at 08:35:31, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On October 29, 2001 at 15:53:30, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On October 29, 2001 at 14:43:50, Gordon Rattray wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 29, 2001 at 13:49:18, Manuel Rodriguez Blanco wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I will hold too, i was disapoint when see much bugs in Fritz 6 and i dont want
>>>>>the same again,
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks for the info,
>>>>>
>>>>>Manuel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Me too. I'm not just jumping on the bandwagon; I'm fed up having to use service
>>>>packs for something that should be better quality in the first place. I can
>>>>accept subtle bugs, but fundamental functionality not working isn't what I pay
>>>>for.
>>>>
>>>>Many of us like chess programs that play strong chess. However, it's time that
>>>>Chessbase realised that there's more to a chess program than just playing
>>>>strength.
>>>>
>>>>Gordon
>>>
>>>
>>>The problem with "waiting" is you will still get the same CD and must then
>>>download the SP to make it work. They never cut new CD's after a SP.
>>>Jim
>>
>>CA does. The newer CA6's being sent out are already the 6.1 version though the
>>SP of 6.1 can easily be donwloaded from the site if by any chance your CD came
>>with CA 6.0.
>>
>
>CA6 is not made by Chessbase.
You didn't specify Chessbase, so I took "they" to mean the industry in general.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.