Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 20:15:01 05/29/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 1998 at 22:20:42, Mark Young wrote: >Come on Thorsten. Lets get real here. Chess System Tal is a good >program. But its light years away for the strenght of Nimzo98, Junior >4.6, or Fritz 5. Do you have CSTal ? Do you have Nimzo98 ? Do you have Fritz5 ? Do you have 2 pc's of same speed ? I would like to know how YOU get YOUR reality ? I get mine by connecting my 2 pc's and let them play overnight (cstal-nimzo98) or play manually fritz5-cstal. If I would have the opinion that fritz5 and nimzo98 would be light years away (one light year is 9.4605 x 10E12 km's) from cstal, I would not try to suggest something different here. My results are not like the analogies you suggest. >You only call other people bean counters, because that is the only way >you have to defend Chess system Tal's poor showing. Chess System Tal is >getting killed by the dumb fast searches. I don't see why or how you can construct this reality. >If you want to judge programs on how pretty you think they play. Fine. >They rest of us will bean count. You know why, because that how you tell >if someone or some thing is better at chess. Thats the way it has always >been done. After Alekhine beat Capablanca. I wounder if Capablanca took >comfort in the fact that some people thought he played Pretty, and more >positional looking moves. The point is you can try to make a program >play very positional looking moves. But if its not sound tacticlly, its >not worth much. Remember even the positionally minded Humans say that >chess is 90% tactics. I tend to think the real nature of chess is 100% >tactics. There is no 100 %. This is against quantum mechanics. Maybe in newton mechanics. Your reality is not mine. I don'T know on which "facts" you try to talk here, but i hope you would have as much games I have played so far. I don't agree with your comments concerning capablanca and aljechin. CSTal was not designed to play postional moves. Otherwise we would have named it different. Tal was not famous for his positional play, he was famous for his attacks. Straighten your facts ! You are wrong with your argumentation.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.