Author: José Carlos
Date: 04:04:50 10/31/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2001 at 14:49:42, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 30, 2001 at 13:32:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 30, 2001 at 07:24:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>46:04 0 0 327781499 (111597415) 14 -0.078 Bh5-g6 Nf1-d2 Qb6-c7 a3-a4 Kg8-h7 Ne3- >>>c4 Nd7-b6 Nc4xa5 Bc5-b4 c2-c3 Bb4xa5 b3-b4 Nb6-d7 b4xa5 Nd7-c5 h3-h4 >>> >>>Diep doesn't consider the bad move g5-g4. >>> >> >> >> >> >>Diep also doesn't _understand_ the position. It thinks black is worse by >>a very tiny bit. (-.078). That is a strong _understatement_ here. Black is >>nearly losing. > >It is nor clear and the only way to test it is by games. >Can you win diep in a correspondence game after Diep's move Bg6? That's absurd. Do you mean that I only can say who better in a position if I can win anyone in that position?. Do you mean that I can't say white is better if in the initial position I remove black pawn in f7 because Kasparov would win me with black? José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.