Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 07:35:38 11/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2001 at 06:21:48, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 01, 2001 at 05:58:31, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>In the meantime there is some evidence that Fritz7 noMMX might be stronger than >>the original Fritz7. Therefore, your results are not so surprising. >>Kurt > >His results are about Fritz7 MMX so if Fritz7 no MMX ia stronger then >I do not see the point. > >I also understand that no MMX is only for very old hardware so we can expect MMX >to be better on every hardare that is practically used today. > In one set of tests (sorry, I forget who originally posted them), the NoMMX version did better against EVERY other engine (sometimes MUCH better): Fritz 7 Standard NoMMX vs Chess Tiger 14.0 05.0 – 11.0 07.0 - 09.0 vs Comet B22 11.0 – 05.0 13.0 - 03.0 vs Crafty 17.13 09.0 - 07.0 11.5 - 04.5 vs Gambit Tiger 2 04.0 - 12.0 06.0 - 10.0 vs Hiarcs 7.32 06.5 - 09.5 08.5 - 07.5 vs Junior 7 04.5 - 11.5 08.5 - 07.5 vs Nimzo 7.32 09.0 - 07.0 10.0 - 06.0 vs Nimzo 8 07.5 - 08.5 11.5 - 04.5 vs SOS (03/2000) 10.0 - 06.0 14.5 - 01.5 vs Shredder 5.32 07.0 - 09.0 07.5 - 08.5 ------------------------------------------------ Total 73.5 – 86.5 98.0 – 62.0 This is a dramatic difference in favor of the NoMMX version (under 46% score versus over 61% score). I believe it was run on modern hardware (i.e., with MMX support). I don't remember the time controls.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.