Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 09:19:21 11/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2001 at 10:58:11, stuart taylor wrote: >On November 01, 2001 at 10:35:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 01, 2001 at 10:24:08, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>According to available results, which looks strongest? >>>1.GT >>>2.CT >>>3.Fritz 7.0 >>>4.DF >>>5.Shredder 5.32 >>>6.Other >>> >>>I would guess the order is something like >>> >>>1.DF >>>2.GT >>>3.Shr. 5.32 >>>4.Fr.7.0 >>>5.CT >>>6.Others >>> >>>And, which of them are due for a patch (Or imminent upgrade) which will make >>>their results better? >>> >>>And does anyone know what is due out new in the next 6 weeks (because then I >>>will be passing through the Chess shop in London where I normally buy my >>>programs)? >>>Thanks! >>> >>>S.Taylor >> >>I would say: >> >>1.Fritz 7 (no mmx) >>2.CT >>3.GT >>4.DF/DJ7/Shredder 5.32 >> >>Very close in the top though, depends on Time, hardware and operators :) >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Sorry, I forgot Junior. >I'm thinking mainly of long time controls. >And do you mean CT14? Or higher? >ssdf and others put GT2 significantly higher than CT14. >I realize of course that you have done extensive testing, though that looks to >me like the equivalent of about 15 mins. per game (on average) if it were on an >AMD 1.4 Ghz.(I mean, the same moves might have been played with that). >Regards >S.Taylor Sorry i meant 2.GT 3.CT You cannot compare hardware like that, Standard TC is Standard TC no matter what hardware you use. Although i wouldn't be surprised if some engines would do better on faster hardware and others worse. 40/120+40/60+30 on a Celeron 500 Mhz is not equivalent to 15 min per game on an AMD 1.4 Ghz. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.