Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 10:49:48 11/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2001 at 12:51:58, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >Dear Stuart, > >When playing Junior or ChessTiger just give yourself rook odds. Take away at >least a rook and you should have a chance of beating the machine without >resorting to error generation. Maybe good advice to ex US military staff - but not to chessplayers! Try once more! Sune You will have to think hard to beat the machine >but it will not be a "give-me". > > >Soon the machines will be putting us in virtual reality playing against a sexy >human female with various levels of play. In the background sweet violin music >from YoYo Ma will lift our spirits. The smells of cinnamon and apple will make >us hungry. Ahh, the good life. > > >Enjoy, > >TIM > >On November 01, 2001 at 11:14:06, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Setting. >>Maybe the wording should be something like this. >>"Anti-human" makes it look like it's designed simply to make life hard, i.e. >>tedious and taxing for humans, and therefore to be used by massochists. >>But in fact it should be more humane really, as it is made to bring out the best >>from the human, as well as, at the same time to give him the best "human" >>challenge. >>Human vs. "for computers" should result in the anti-computer experts getting >>very succesful results compared to their ELO, and the non anti-computer experts >>getting a relatively low success rate.(until tey get the hang of it, and maybe >>to even take tranquilizers before the game!) >> >>I mean that perhaps, it should become official that when a human plays a >>program, you are talking about the "for humans" mode. >>S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.