Author: stuart taylor
Date: 04:22:58 11/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2001 at 02:27:26, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On November 01, 2001 at 20:03:57, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On November 01, 2001 at 12:19:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:58:11, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:35:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:24:08, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>According to available results, which looks strongest? >>>>>>1.GT >>>>>>2.CT >>>>>>3.Fritz 7.0 >>>>>>4.DF >>>>>>5.Shredder 5.32 >>>>>>6.Other >>>>>> >>>>>>I would guess the order is something like >>>>>> >>>>>>1.DF >>>>>>2.GT >>>>>>3.Shr. 5.32 >>>>>>4.Fr.7.0 >>>>>>5.CT >>>>>>6.Others >>>>>> >>>>>>And, which of them are due for a patch (Or imminent upgrade) which will make >>>>>>their results better? >>>>>> >>>>>>And does anyone know what is due out new in the next 6 weeks (because then I >>>>>>will be passing through the Chess shop in London where I normally buy my >>>>>>programs)? >>>>>>Thanks! >>>>>> >>>>>>S.Taylor >>>>> >>>>>I would say: >>>>> >>>>>1.Fritz 7 (no mmx) >>>>>2.CT >>>>>3.GT >>>>>4.DF/DJ7/Shredder 5.32 >>>>> >>>>>Very close in the top though, depends on Time, hardware and operators :) >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Jonas >>>> >>>>Sorry, I forgot Junior. >>>>I'm thinking mainly of long time controls. >>>>And do you mean CT14? Or higher? >>>>ssdf and others put GT2 significantly higher than CT14. >>>>I realize of course that you have done extensive testing, though that looks to >>>>me like the equivalent of about 15 mins. per game (on average) if it were on an >>>>AMD 1.4 Ghz.(I mean, the same moves might have been played with that). >>>>Regards >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Sorry i meant >>>2.GT >>>3.CT >>> >>>You cannot compare hardware like that, Standard TC is Standard TC no matter what >>>hardware you use. Although i wouldn't be surprised if some engines would do >>>better on faster hardware and others worse. 40/120+40/60+30 on a Celeron 500 Mhz >>>is not equivalent to 15 min per game on an AMD 1.4 Ghz. >>> >>>Regards >>>Jonas >> >>Sorry, I thought it was 40/40 etc. >>And, what is "standard TC?" It looks like something interesting! What? that the >>speed is the same on any hardware? How would you get that? >>regards, >>S.Taylor > >The 40/40+40/40+40 games i played with Fritz 7 was done on a 900 Mhz T-bird. >Standard TC= 40/120+20/60+30.(is the TC i use for my other live games where is >use a Celeron 500 Mhz) >What do you mean with "that the speed is the same on any hardware?)and how do >you come to the conclusion, that i said that in my previous post? :) > >Regards >Jonas Pure imagination! So I STILL don't know what standard TC means Oh! Time control??? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.