Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chess or Gambit Tiger?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 08:38:52 11/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 02, 2001 at 09:27:33, Dan Andersson wrote:

>Yepp:) But that's a future version. CT is a proven winner, even if it is a bit
>dull. I have an easier time playing GT that CT myself. I often catch it with
>it's pants down. But then I'm a pretty tactical player myself. IMO any IM/GM
>will be that too.

Chesstiger14 was the proven winner in argentina

Mark young claimed that Gambittiger is probably better than tiger14 at long time
control based on his comp-comp games(4 hours/40 moves).
The interesting question is what is the time control of your games.

if you play something like 40/40 with p800 then it is not a surprise that you
find chesstiger14 to be better based on Mark young's posts

I remember that he claimed that Gambittiger probably starts to be better than
tiger14 only when it has more than 1 minute per move on fast hardware.

I do not know if he is right and he admitted that he had not enough games to be
sure about it.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.