Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 09:28:37 11/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2001 at 07:22:58, stuart taylor wrote: >On November 02, 2001 at 02:27:26, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On November 01, 2001 at 20:03:57, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On November 01, 2001 at 12:19:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:58:11, stuart taylor wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:35:00, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 01, 2001 at 10:24:08, stuart taylor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>According to available results, which looks strongest? >>>>>>>1.GT >>>>>>>2.CT >>>>>>>3.Fritz 7.0 >>>>>>>4.DF >>>>>>>5.Shredder 5.32 >>>>>>>6.Other >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I would guess the order is something like >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1.DF >>>>>>>2.GT >>>>>>>3.Shr. 5.32 >>>>>>>4.Fr.7.0 >>>>>>>5.CT >>>>>>>6.Others >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And, which of them are due for a patch (Or imminent upgrade) which will make >>>>>>>their results better? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>And does anyone know what is due out new in the next 6 weeks (because then I >>>>>>>will be passing through the Chess shop in London where I normally buy my >>>>>>>programs)? >>>>>>>Thanks! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>S.Taylor >>>>>> >>>>>>I would say: >>>>>> >>>>>>1.Fritz 7 (no mmx) >>>>>>2.CT >>>>>>3.GT >>>>>>4.DF/DJ7/Shredder 5.32 >>>>>> >>>>>>Very close in the top though, depends on Time, hardware and operators :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Regards >>>>>>Jonas >>>>> >>>>>Sorry, I forgot Junior. >>>>>I'm thinking mainly of long time controls. >>>>>And do you mean CT14? Or higher? >>>>>ssdf and others put GT2 significantly higher than CT14. >>>>>I realize of course that you have done extensive testing, though that looks to >>>>>me like the equivalent of about 15 mins. per game (on average) if it were on an >>>>>AMD 1.4 Ghz.(I mean, the same moves might have been played with that). >>>>>Regards >>>>>S.Taylor >>>> >>>>Sorry i meant >>>>2.GT >>>>3.CT >>>> >>>>You cannot compare hardware like that, Standard TC is Standard TC no matter what >>>>hardware you use. Although i wouldn't be surprised if some engines would do >>>>better on faster hardware and others worse. 40/120+40/60+30 on a Celeron 500 Mhz >>>>is not equivalent to 15 min per game on an AMD 1.4 Ghz. >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>Sorry, I thought it was 40/40 etc. >>>And, what is "standard TC?" It looks like something interesting! What? that the >>>speed is the same on any hardware? How would you get that? >>>regards, >>>S.Taylor >> >>The 40/40+40/40+40 games i played with Fritz 7 was done on a 900 Mhz T-bird. >>Standard TC= 40/120+20/60+30.(is the TC i use for my other live games where is >>use a Celeron 500 Mhz) >>What do you mean with "that the speed is the same on any hardware?)and how do >>you come to the conclusion, that i said that in my previous post? :) >> >>Regards >>Jonas >Pure imagination! >So I STILL don't know what standard TC means >Oh! Time control??? >S.Taylor TC= Time Contrtol Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.