Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:04:22 11/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2001 at 12:25:30, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >These two very interesting examples has caught my attention recently; >As readers are well aware very few combinations occuring in games between >master players are beyond the reach of computer analysis.Both these positions >were tested on a 500 Mhz Computer running chessmaster 8000 and Fritz6 for 24 >hours with no result. What is the move and the score of Fritz6 and CM8000 after 24 hours? The fact that they do not want to play the suggested move does not prove that their move is wrong and it is possible that they found an alternative win. Here is some short analysis of Junior7 on a slow p200 for the second position it failed high on Qe3 so I suspect that Qe3 is also a winning move New game - Junior 7 [D]r1bq1r2/p2np1k1/3p2pR/3pP3/2pP4/5N2/PP2Q1P1/2KR1B2 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Junior 7: 19.Rh1 dxe5 20.Nxe5 = (-0.13) Depth: 3 00:00:00 19.exd6 exd6 20.Qe3 Rb8 = (0.06) Depth: 3 00:00:00 19.Qe3 dxe5 20.Nxe5 ² (0.31) Depth: 3 00:00:00 19.Qe3 dxe5 20.Qg5 Qb6 21.Nxe5 Nxe5 = (0.16) Depth: 6 00:00:00 10kN 19.Qe3! ² (0.46) Depth: 9 00:00:01 138kN 19.Qe3! dxe5 20.Qg5 Qb6 21.Bd3 Rf6 22.Bxg6 Nf8 23.Be8+ ² (0.57) Depth: 9 00:00:03 394kN 19.Qe3 dxe5 20.Qg5 Qe8 21.dxe5 Rf5 22.Qh4 Qg8 23.Ng5 Rf2 ± (0.84) Depth: 12 00:00:22 2820kN 19.Qe3 dxe5 20.Rxg6+ Kxg6 21.Qg5+ Kf7 22.Qf5+ Kg7 23.Qg4+ Kf6 24.dxe5+ Nxe5 25.Qg5+ Kf7 26.Nxe5+ Ke6 27.Bxc4 Bb7 28.Qg7 ± (1.04) Depth: 14 00:05:04 34924kN 19.Qe3! ± (1.34) Depth: 15 00:11:19 71839kN Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.