Author: Slater Wold
Date: 12:44:33 11/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 02, 2001 at 13:56:28, K. Burcham wrote: > > [D] 1r1q2k1/7p/2p3p1/p2pbrn1/8/BPNQ1PP1/P3P1K1/3RR3 b - - > >slate i think the positive results for Bxg3 are too deep for programs to see, to >justify the bishop sac. i am analyzing also. and i will also play this one >out with two programs. but so far it does seem that Bxg3 wins > >kburcham W,S - Deep Junior 7 1r1q2k1/7p/2p3p1/p2pbrn1/8/BPNQ1PP1/P3P1K1/3RR3 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Deep Junior 7: 1...h5 2.Bc5 ³ (-0.28) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 ³ (-0.48) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 ³ (-0.48) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 ³ (-0.48) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 ³ (-0.48) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 ³ (-0.48) Depth: 3 00:00:00 1...Ne6 2.Rh1 Qb6 ³ (-0.34) Depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN 1...Qc7 2.f4 Bxc3 3.Qxc3 Ne4 4.Qd4 Rh5 ³ (-0.41) Depth: 6 00:00:00 11kN 1...Qc7 2.f4 Bxc3 3.Qxc3 Ne4 4.Qe3 g5 5.Rf1 gxf4 6.gxf4 ³ (-0.44) Depth: 9 00:00:00 103kN 1...Ne6! µ (-0.71) Depth: 9 00:00:00 155kN 1...Ne6 2.Bc1 Rh5 3.e4 Nc5 4.Qe3 d4 5.Qg1 Qe7 ³ (-0.62) Depth: 12 00:00:01 1224kN 1...Qf6 2.f4 Bxc3 3.fxg5 Rxg5 4.Rf1 Rf5 5.Rxf5 gxf5 6.Rf1 Re8 7.Rxf5 µ (-0.71) Depth: 12 00:00:04 8932kN 1...Qf6 2.f4 Bxc3 3.fxg5 Qe5 4.e4 Bxe1 5.exf5 gxf5 6.Rc1 Re8 µ (-0.77) Depth: 15 00:00:36 78348kN 1...Qf6 2.f4 Bxc3 3.fxg5 Qe5 4.e4 Rxg5 5.Re3 Bb4 6.exd5 Qxd5+ 7.Qxd5+ Rxd5 8.Rxd5 cxd5 9.Bxb4 axb4 10.Re2 d4 ³ (-0.59) Depth: 18 00:05:53 758257kN (W, 02.11.2001) I'll give it more time later. I am very busy. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.