Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:21:54 11/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 03, 2001 at 18:06:36, Dan Andersson wrote: >I would say that the mistake was 31... Qxf4 The game seems terribly one sided >after that. Not that blacks position is that tasty before, except for white that >is:) > >MvH Dan Andersson I can say that I do not know what was the losing mistake and the only clear thing is that there is a drop in the evaluation of more than 1 pawn after Qg5 The only logical alternative is Qh6 and we need to analyze the position after Qh6 in order to prove a clear advantage for white before claiming that Qxf4 was a mistake. I am also not sure that Qg5 is the losing mistake because I did not analyze it enough and evaluation of +1.xx is not a proof but I believe that black is losing after Qg5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.