Author: leonid
Date: 18:06:32 11/03/01
Go up one level in this thread
>You can give it option "-s" at the command line, i.e. instead of > chest319 -b inputfile >you say > chest319 -b -s inputfile Thanks! I need exactly this. >Fortunately, there will be a version 4.1 to come, which will also include >Nalimov EGTBs and will work as a winboard engine. I hope to be ready >around Christmas. Do I understand well? Your program will come as compatible engin that could be used from programs like Fritz, Hiarcs and so like? If it is this, it is what I consider the most important before your solver will be in every big chess programs. Until now, I found only one mate solver engin in one professional program, between those that I have. As good as this engin inclusion looked to me (and I expect it will be in the next version of that chess program) your is well beyond seeing mate solving engin performance. No doubt in this! I verified some positions to see this. >>I hope that now Windows will become something of half way between previous >>Windows and actual Linux. Would like to see this. I am very fond of Microsoft >>Assembler. > >Hmmm, somehow I doubt it. But those doubts may well be wrong. >Let's hope and see... Probably what you say have much bigger chance to be realized that my hopes. Already IBM royally screw its good expectation to be first system by not providing open access to its OS/2 system. There IBM had its own SDK like package with the same heavy tag price and almost the same big company oriented policy. Why Microsoft will be wiser? I just must stop dreaming and go to my Linux retraining. Probably, when I will have next computer for Linux, I will do just right this. Cheers, Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.