Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 00:17:22 11/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2001 at 01:33:23, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>On November 03, 2001 at 23:29:51, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On November 03, 2001 at 20:55:27, Dr. Franklin wrote:
>>
>>>On November 03, 2001 at 00:27:23, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 03, 2001 at 00:09:26, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 02, 2001 at 20:14:11, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 02, 2001 at 14:42:26, Drazen Marovic wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What is the Estimated Elo Of ChessTiger on PalmVx?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Between 2000 and 2100 FIDE elo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Is the novag Sapphire much better hardware than what the PalmVx provides? I
>>>>>believe novage claims between 2200 and 2300 elo?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They are probably claiming USCF elo, which is different than FIDE elo. The
>>>>Sapphire II is rated 2012 elo by the SSDF (SSDF elo is close to FIDE elo).
>>>>
>>>>If you want a source of objective ratings, please have a look at the SSDF list:
>>>>
>>>> http://home3.swipnet.se/~w-36794/ssdf/nr000.htm
>>>>
>>>>Then you can have a look at the comparison between Chess Tiger for Palm and
>>>>ChessGenius for Palm:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.chesstiger.com/ctgen.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Christophe
>>>
>>> I believe the Novag saffire2 is much stronger then 2012, so in this Case SSDF
>>>is way off.
>>
>>
>>
>>It is possible. Some time ago they have decided to subtract 100 points to ALL
>>the programs and computers in their list, just because they felt (with some
>>evidence) that the top programs/computers were overrated.
>>
>>OK, it was probably justified for the top of the list.
>>
>>But even the bottom of the list has got this "punishement".
>>
>>I think it was definitely a wrong thing to do. Now the bottom of the list is
>>underrated by 100 elo points, approximately.
>>
>>I think they thought that nobody cared anymore for the bottom of the list, but
>>it is wrong. Handheld computers are the new trend in chess computers, and they
>>belong to the part of the list which is now underrated.
>>
>>Thus more and more people will complain.
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>So do you think Tiger on the palm Vx is stronger than sapphire?
I think it is, but this has to be verified by playing matches.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.