Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: why did the sides agree to a draw in sjeng-tiger14.6?

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 12:07:33 11/04/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 04, 2001 at 14:46:45, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On November 03, 2001 at 14:52:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>Is it a draw or maybe sjeng missed a chance to win the game against tiger by
>>agreeing to a draw?
>>
>>Sjeng - Chess Tiger 14.6
>>8/5p1p/5Kp1/3n4/8/4P1P1/1kp2P1P/5R2 w - - 0 1
>
>It's hard to tell really. If the white king can eliminate all black
>pawns, it's at least a draw for white. But I wasn't sure that
>
>a) it was really possible (Sjeng only had two captures in the PV)
>b) Sjeng was actually going to do it instead of saving it's white
>pawns (which scared me most)
>
>So I gladly took the draw.

This is a matter of opinion for sure. But I think this is somehow the wrong
approach. At least it would be nicer if the operator ( even if the programmer
himself) could only accept or offer draw if the engine suggests to do so.

IMHO the programmer should be able to do anything he wants _before_ the game
starts, but then he should be the slave to his program's decisions.

No offense or accuse at all - maybe a suggestion for future events ?! Nah - just
some random opinion.

The way it is dealt with currently is somehow similar to team events with the
programmer being the team captain. But I think the task was to create an
automated chessplayer able to do all the job itself once the game has started.
It simply needs someone to make the moves on the board and to press the clock as
it has no arms itself.

The principal situation you described above could be dealt with a contempt
factor for example - much nicer solution.

Regards,
pete



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.