Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:04:09 11/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2001 at 17:15:35, Hans van der Zijden wrote: >I entered the Open Dutch tournament without any hope of scoring a point. I would >have been satisfied with one not too bad game. The reason for this is that I >just started programming on Gadget the last 5 months I think. When Gadget >reached a depth of 6 ply in about 90 seconds average, I started thinking about >implementing quiescence search. This proved to be too difficult for different >reasons (one being that I am very lazy). Eventually I had to decide to play with >the old version. Apart from not having QS I also lacked hashtables, permanent >brain, nullmove, some necesary chessknowledge and who knows what more. I >practised against the Kasparov GK 2000 (about 1850 elo). Gadget on 90 minutes >for the whole game and the GK 2000 on 1 sec/move. Gadget lost 3½-½. And now I >had to play 2300+ programs calculating double the number of plies Gadget >reached. But it only got severely beaten by Fritz (mate in 23) and Kallisto II >(mate in 31). Most other games it was only slowly smothered. Against Diep Gadget >last a pawn on move 20 but then it took Diep 24 more moves before he won the >second pawn. Against Ant it was a clear draw after 74 moves but then Gadget took >a poisened pawn and lost after move 93. Gadget even won a game against another >debutant. What happened? Am I dreaming? I think that you do not understand the game of chess. I guess that the rating of your program against humans can be close to 1600 but even 1600 players are not going to lose every game in the opening against masters. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.