Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does anyone know why Gadget wasn't crushed in every game?

Author: Jeroen Noomen

Date: 08:30:29 11/05/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 05, 2001 at 09:13:27, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>The others that played 1.d4 needed way longer. Some
>even 1 hour for a single move to decide if i have heart the rumours well... :)


Yeah, it was Diep! That would be the sensation of the
tournament: Diep - Gadget 0:1 (TIME). Poor Ernst Walet,
last minute operator, didn't know what to do.

For all the readers: I saw how Diep was operated and this
is far from simple. Vincent had to play a match in the
afternoon and asked Ernst to be the Diep operator for two
games. He gave him one paper with only a few lines on it
'how to operate Diep', that was it :-))). Even a Windows
diehard would have to pass here, I am afraid! Diep responded
by thinking for ONE WHOLE HOUR about a move against Gadget.
Needless to say almost everybody hoped Gadget would win!
And when Vincent would return, we would have told him 'It is
going badly, you lost to Gadget'. Without telling the whole
story of course :-))).

Moral: Never leave the Dutch Open for some stupid KNSB
match, 'cause your program will punish you immediately :-)))

Jeroen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.