Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with the magnet? [WAC.100 again]

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 19:37:59 11/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2001 at 22:33:16, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi Slate,
>
>>Are you using the default settings??
>
>sometimes it is good to look at the PV instead trying to compare with other
>score outputs of comps... :) The second move of his posted PV was c5 which is
>definitely not possible - I believe that he has entered the position wrong, and
>forget the black pawn on c5... Then it is correct and it is a mate in 13... :)
>
>Greets, Thomas
>
>To Dann: well, what the engine must see here: That it can't break through with
>it's two connected passers on the queen side and his king must walk to the king
>side where it can create new passers which will be unstopable for black - By the
>way, I think this position should be taken out of WAC because Be3 IS a solution
>but many engines find this solution by accident and not because they understand
>it... when they find b6+ it is clear that the engine has understand what is to
>do... and don't be to critic about my chess-comment - at least I can not really
>play chess... :)

Good advice!

Perhaps I am too naive.  I tend to rule out human error when it comes to copy
and pasting.  :)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.