Author: Tony Werten
Date: 22:11:13 11/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 06, 2001 at 12:14:33, Johan Hutting wrote: >On November 06, 2001 at 09:19:18, Tony Werten wrote: > ><snip> >>>If the rules prohibited restarting winboard then that's where it ends... I lost >>>against XiniX on time in Leiden earlier this year because my time correction was >>>bugged (I _was_ aware of the problem, yet chose a wrong solution). The position >>>could have become a draw, but you didn't see me make a scene about it. >> >>Before confusion starts, the example I gave was from the dutch open last year. >> >>Didn't know about yet another win of this kind. ( I didn't operate XiniX myself >>last may ) > >Hans didn't tell you about your 'extra' bishop on e4? :) >I'm sure there are some more wins like this, along with games that had other >conflicts... XiniX had some bugs in pondering and Hans wasn't really happy after the tournament. He did tell me there was one program wich showed it's bugs earlier than XiniX and he won :) It does seem to indicate I'm making progress. The 4.5 points I got at the dutch open were won with good chess, throwing away only about 2 points because of bugs. I thought I took them all out and blamed the timetrouble in combination with my Celeron 700 and 16 Mb hashtable. I still seem to have one though that only shows up when there's a big fail low and I alocate extra time and do extra search. It will be out by the next tournament. Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.