Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 05:23:38 11/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2001 at 06:04:07, Jouni Uski wrote: >On November 07, 2001 at 05:51:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 07, 2001 at 05:14:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2001 at 05:07:26, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Eduard, >>>>Could you please try with regular timings games (40/2h) , I think should be >>>>nicer for Fritz especially if running on slow machines that requires more >>>>pondering time. >>>> >>> >>>With longer games programs are worse actually! But of course it takes Eduard >>>some weeks/months to get one win against Fritz in 40/2h... >>> >>>Jouni >> >>1)With longer games program are better and not worse >> > >I must be more precise: with longer games programs are RELATIVELY weaker >than humans. Example Fritz got >2800 rating in blitz in Frankfurt, but only >about 2500 in long games in Holland and so on... > >Jouni I concur with that assessment Jouni, but the programme should have solved that combination, at longer T/C regardless. Actually I looked at it half asleep...sort of, it's still early and I'm still tired and I saw the mistake rather quickly! I'm surprised even on a so-called _slow_ machine even at G/5 or whatever missed the tactics of Qxh3?? If I can see the danger quickly in a stupor, then Fritz 7 should under it's *adverse* situation should have also. Well, IMHO. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.