Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: another test position based on my correspondence game

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:24:13 11/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 07, 2001 at 09:19:27, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 07, 2001 at 09:09:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On November 07, 2001 at 08:59:35, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>So you 'proof' whether a move is bad using a preprocessor program
>>junior 5.9 by letting it play some other engine out that line?
>>
>>That's how you play corr chess?
>
>There are cases when I play comp-comp games to learn about unclear positions.
>I also check some ideas of me in games and there are rare cases when I play a
>move that was not suggested by computers even after a long search.
>
>Uri

I can add that Junior5.9 is not a preprocessor in most positions
Junior5.9 did good results with black(did not lose)
so if it is a preprocessor and weak then the fact that it did not lose the games
only support my opinion.

I considered Junior5.9 to be weaker than Deep Fritz and
I decided not to play Nd5 after seeing that Deep Fritz is unable to win with
white against Junior5.9

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.