Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 06:27:21 11/07/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2001 at 09:24:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 07, 2001 at 09:19:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 07, 2001 at 09:09:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2001 at 08:59:35, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>So you 'proof' whether a move is bad using a preprocessor program >>>junior 5.9 by letting it play some other engine out that line? >>> >>>That's how you play corr chess? >> >>There are cases when I play comp-comp games to learn about unclear positions. >>I also check some ideas of me in games and there are rare cases when I play a >>move that was not suggested by computers even after a long search. >> >>Uri > >I can add that Junior5.9 is not a preprocessor in most positions >Junior5.9 did good results with black(did not lose) >so if it is a preprocessor and weak then the fact that it did not lose the games >only support my opinion. > >I considered Junior5.9 to be weaker than Deep Fritz and >I decided not to play Nd5 after seeing that Deep Fritz is unable to win with >white against Junior5.9 > >Uri Let's assume you are right and that junior5.9 is weaker than fritz. Let's guess it at 40 elopoints. that means that it still scores like 42% against deepfritz. So in 42% of the cases you are going to make a wrong assumption?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.