Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What's wrong with the magnet? [WAC.100 again]

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 07:07:44 11/07/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 06, 2001 at 23:30:46, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>the mistake here was working a twelve hour shift and setting up a test position
>when tired. i was puzzled with dan's post reply and of course with slate's also.
>but thanks to thomas mayer, i checked the c5 move and reset the position
>assuming i left the c5 pawn at home.  as you can see with this position, i
>duplicated the analysis with the mate in 13. of course it is showing mate in 1
>second because of position learning.  well any way the rush was fun, sorry to
>dan, sorry to slate, and thanks to thomas for pointing out my stupid mistake. i
>will triple check my test positions in the future.  also it is funny the c5 is
>not there this time, a different line to mate.
>
>
> [D] 8/k1b5/P4p2/1P3p1p/K1P2P1P/8/3B4/8 w - -
It's fine.  I was just aggravated on how in the world you were getting this
result, and I wasn't.

Chessbase engines stop this, because they show the line they are looking at.  If
I had paid a little more attention, I could've seen it too.  Oh well.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.