Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 03:53:48 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 05:50:10, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi José, > >> Kein Problem, nur eine Frage. Ist es nicht langweilig, die gleiche Partie >> wieder zu gewinnen? > >you missed the point - compare those two games - one with 30 minutes, another >one with 60 minutes - the moves were not all the same, but the idea behind the >game was the same. He uses several ideas to crush those beasts and they seem to >work on almost any level. The science is to get the computer humbling in those >traps. It seems it is always possible - now think about that Kramnik prepares >some of such ideas - and he can do that for sure much better then Eduard. > >By the way, Eduard has played some games on the F7-Server against my program >Quark - he lost because he do not know the program. So his gambit doesn't work for each program , I suppose... But it was extremely >interesting to watch those games, Eduard moves around doing nearly nothing and >trying to get the engine making some stupid moves he wants for his attack... >that is very cool - it's like knocking on all the stones of the engines wall to >find a hole. That's better named trial and error approach... I believe when giving my program to Eduard and let him try a day or >two Quark will not win any game against Eduard except I use maybe a completely >different opening book with some strange lines... I don't think so because to find weak points in a strong program needs hard work and don't think there is an universal magic gambit applicable for each program . In any case programmers (first of all Fritz's father) have to appreciate this work of Eduard, since he can identify weak points (let's say bugs...) and help them to improve their creaures. Greetings, Otello. > >Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.