Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:37:57 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 07, 2001 at 08:23:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >On November 07, 2001 at 06:04:07, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>On November 07, 2001 at 05:51:44, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 07, 2001 at 05:14:29, Jouni Uski wrote: >>> >>>>On November 07, 2001 at 05:07:26, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi Eduard, >>>>>Could you please try with regular timings games (40/2h) , I think should be >>>>>nicer for Fritz especially if running on slow machines that requires more >>>>>pondering time. >>>>> >>>> >>>>With longer games programs are worse actually! But of course it takes Eduard >>>>some weeks/months to get one win against Fritz in 40/2h... >>>> >>>>Jouni >>> >>>1)With longer games program are better and not worse >>> >> >>I must be more precise: with longer games programs are RELATIVELY weaker >>than humans. Example Fritz got >2800 rating in blitz in Frankfurt, but only >>about 2500 in long games in Holland and so on... >> >>Jouni > >I concur with that assessment Jouni, but the programme should have solved that >combination, at longer T/C regardless. > >Actually I looked at it half asleep...sort of, it's still early and I'm still >tired and I saw the mistake rather quickly! > >I'm surprised even on a so-called _slow_ machine even at G/5 or whatever missed >the tactics of Qxh3?? > >If I can see the danger quickly in a stupor, then Fritz 7 should under it's >*adverse* situation should have also. Well, IMHO. > >Terry I believe that the problem is the evaluation function Fritz7 probably did not evaluated correctly the unbalanced material structure. Deep Fritz's evaluation is better in this case. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.