Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dilemma after poisened pawn

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 09:16:10 11/08/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 07, 2001 at 18:50:31, Tina Long wrote:

>I still believe that seeing what the top players have played, and reading their
>reasons and analysis in books is FAR better than "infinite analysis" by a
>current chess program.


I know you are indirectly referring to Uri, who thinks computers are better.
I'm kind of in the middle.  I think top GMs are better most of the time, but
occasionally the computer can find something that GMs have overlooked or
underestimated.  The best of all, of course, is a top GM working WITH a
computer.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.