Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Request for an EPD pounding of 3 rows

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 21:23:30 11/09/01

My bad chess intuition is bothing me.  The first position here is just WAC.264
and the two following positions are the aftermath of two possible choces.  The
second one is correct, but I wonder if (in the long run) the first choice isn't
really better.  Maybe someone with hot hardware or a lot of time to burn could
give these guys a blasting and see what falls out...

[D]r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - -
[D]r2r2k1/1R3p2/p5pp/2P1q3/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 w - -
[D]1r1r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 w - -

Re: 2 hours a position Slater Wold 13:37:18 11/10/01
- Re: 2 hours a position Dann Corbit 14:25:11 11/12/01
Re: Request for an EPD pounding of 3 rows Gian-Carlo Pascutto 04:28:00 11/10/01
- Re: Request for an EPD pounding of 3 rows K. Burcham 06:11:13 11/10/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.