Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:49:33 11/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 01:46:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 00:09:40, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>On November 09, 2001 at 19:56:34, Thomas Mayer wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>in winboard forum one has posted some games of Palm Tiger against not so strong >>>winboard engines. >>>Next is interesting: >>> >> >>I had an 11 year old student about what you would call 1600-1800 beat tiger 3 >>straight games at game in 15 minutes on a palm Vx. It is not very strong at all >>on quick time controls. > > >I believe that your results are misleading because I remmeber that you used the >unregistered version. > >You said that tiger was lost before the move that the level goes down but even >the level in the first moves is lower than the level of the registered version >based on your other post about the tiger index. > >Uri Sorry,I see that the problem is different and you simply did not over clock your palm. I also interested to see the first moves of the games that you talk about because saying that tiger had a losing position is not enough and I am not sure that 1600-1800 player can always win won positions against correct defence. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.