Author: Drazen Marovic
Date: 23:42:25 11/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 02:34:31, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 00:09:40, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>On November 09, 2001 at 19:56:34, Thomas Mayer wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>in winboard forum one has posted some games of Palm Tiger against not so strong >>>winboard engines. >>>Next is interesting: >>> >> >>I had an 11 year old student about what you would call 1600-1800 beat tiger 3 >>straight games at game in 15 minutes on a palm Vx. It is not very strong at all >>on quick time controls. I can not say how strong on longer games, its opening >>book unfortunately is also quite limited(this is just the nature of the palm i >>guess). I would say that Tiger is about 1600 at best on the palmVx. Great >>program for casual players, but too weak for tournament players on the palm, but >>that's fine > > > >That's completely wrong. Not true It was in demo mode only after move 24. Tiger was down between -4 and -9 in the 3 games that my student played it, before it went into dmo mode. Now it is true that the palm was not overclocked and had a tigermark of 0.49 it is up to 1.12 now that it has afterburner on - we will see if the results improve. > >You are using the program in demo mode, where it blunders on purpose to draw >conclusions about its strength after 3 games. Great! > >Chess Tiger for Palm played here in Guadeloupe in a human tournament and got a >rating well above 2000. This was game in 15 minutes was this the time control of the tournament you speak of? > >I have several games played against a 2100 elo human player, and Tiger won the >match. Overclocked or at 0.49 tigermarks? > > > Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.