Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: One easy mate to solve.

Author: Paul

Date: 01:26:04 11/10/01

Go up one level in this thread


On November 10, 2001 at 00:53:48, Heiner Marxen wrote:

>On November 09, 2001 at 11:03:54, leonid wrote:
>
>>On November 09, 2001 at 09:17:31, Paul wrote:
>>
>>>On November 09, 2001 at 08:07:10, leonid wrote:
>>>
>>>>[D]nqbqrrQ1/k4P2/4N3/1RRNBK2/2Q5/1N4b1/Bqpqpnq1/8 w - -
>>>>
>>>>Please indicate your result.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Leonid.
>>>
>>>Hi guys!
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>>Mine finds this mate so incredibly fast, that I (almost) don't believe it:
>>>
>>>00:03 WM13 09 Bxb8+ Bxb8 Qa4+ Ba6 Rb7+ Kxb7 Nxd8+ Rxd8 Rb5+ Bxb5 Qxb5+ Ka7 Qa4+
>>>Qa5 Qxa5+ Kb7 Qb5+ Ka7 Qa4+ Kb7 Nc5+ Kc8 Qa6+ Qb7 Qxb7#
>>
>>You found very quickly indeed. Mine took 1.64 sec to find mate in 13 by
>>selective.
>>
>>This mate is mate in 13. I went only 12 moves by brute force to be sure about
>>its depth. Branching factor is very nice on this position and by brute force it
>>is not difficult to solve it even 13 moves deep.
>
>Ah, yes, you are right.  Chest thinks also that this is a mate in 13:
>
>PV: Bxb8+ Bxb8 Qa4+ Ba6 Rb7+ Kxb7 Nxd8+ Rxd8 Rb5+ Bxb5 Qxb5+ Ka7 Qa4+ Qa5 Qxa5+
>Kb7 Qb5+ Ka7 Qa4+ Kb7 Nc5+ Kc8 Qa6+ Qb7 Qxb7#
>
>Uhh... that is exactly Paul's PV, isn't it?

Ohhhh ... now you've done it: people will start thinking Pretz = Chest++ ;)

But seriously ... did you look at the solution tree? Probably not much choice,
also seeing the very small EBF below.

>It was a relatively easy job, with a very small EBF: 320 seconds on my K7/600:
>#  1      0.00s                 0kN           0.87          1-         0
>#  2      0.00s                 0kN           1.00          1-         0
>#  3      0.00s                 1kN [  9.31]  0.94         54-         0
>#  4      0.05s                 3kN [  5.96]  1.04        379-         0
>#  5      0.26s [  5.20]       13kN [  3.99]  1.23       1673-         0
>#  6      0.89s [  3.42]       40kN [  3.13]  1.67       6039-         0
>#  7      2.57s [  2.89]      107kN [  2.67]  2.41      17894-         0
>#  8      6.40s [  2.49]      255kN [  2.37]  3.47      43831-         0
>#  9     14.53s [  2.27]      571kN [  2.24]  4.88      97424-         0
># 10     30.51s [  2.10]     1202kN [  2.11]  6.71     203223-         0
># 11     63.00s [  2.06]     2497kN [  2.08]  8.71     427138-         0
># 12    133.75s [  2.12]     5422kN [  2.17] 10.72     950362-         0
># 13    319.28s [  2.39]    13493kN [  2.49] 11.95    2466562-       223
>
>>>That's quite a difference with the last one, isn't it! And for Heiner: now I'm
>>>pretty sure you'll find something shorter ... ;)
>
>So much about "pretty sure" ;-}

:) ... I know now that I should've checked with Chest before saying something
like that. But I don't have the patience for that anymore ... the d@#$^$d
program always takes soooo long! [<g><d>&<r>] ;)

>You lost!  Or did you win?  :-))   Ahh, now I see: Pretz did win ;-)
>He is much smarter than its author... no, I did not say that <grin>.

Yep ... you've done it again: Pretz already had a bit of an attitude, but now,
after your words ... ouch, she just bit me again! :)

>>>Groetjes from sunny but cold Amsterdam,
>
>Weather here around is similar: cold, but mostly sunny (over the day).
>
>>Cheers from Montreal where it is better to stay indoor. Windy and cold.
>>
>>Leonid.
>>
>Cheers,
>Heiner

Herzliche Grüße,
Paul



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.