Author: Peter Berger
Date: 03:35:13 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 04:47:47, Peter Berger wrote: >On November 09, 2001 at 23:41:38, Thomas Mayer wrote: > >>So there could be no discussion wether we have a rating or not for Grizzly. When >>you want to say now to me, that you believe that Grizzly is over 2200, I must >>laugh a little bit... Michael, the author, would be proud that Théron has said >>it, but would also laugh with me... >> > >I'm not sure if you are right. Following the games it was evident that Grizzly >was much stronger than the other opponents. It seems to have little positional >understanding still and some serious problems with king safety but the search >looks OK and it reaches reasonable depths. I chose Grizzly as I knew earlier >versions to be weak but I am not sure if the new one still is. I think Michael >Lawatsch has found some significant improvements for his engine. > >pete Also have a look at http://f11.parsimony.net/forum16635/messages/17794.htm . pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.