Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 04:28:00 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 00:23:30, Dann Corbit wrote: >My bad chess intuition is bothing me. The first position here is just WAC.264 >and the two following positions are the aftermath of two possible choces. The >second one is correct, but I wonder if (in the long run) the first choice isn't >really better. Maybe someone with hot hardware or a lot of time to burn could >give these guys a blasting and see what falls out... > >[D]r2r2k1/1R2qp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1Q3PPP/1B1R2K1 b - - Playing out Rab8 Rxe7 Rxb2: New game [D]3r2k1/4Rp2/p5pp/2P5/b1PN1b2/P7/1r3PPP/1B1R2K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 7: 3.Rf1 Rxd4 -+ (-2.46) Depth: 11/27 00:00:01 845kN 3.Rf1 Rxd4 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.Bxe4 Be5 6.h4 Ra2 7.h5 Rxa3 8.Re1 gxh5 -+ (-2.43) Depth: 12/29 00:00:06 3072kN 3.Rf1 Rxd4 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.Bxe4 Be5 6.h4 Ra2 7.h5 gxh5 8.Bb7 Rxa3 9.Re1 Bd4 -+ (-2.50) Depth: 13/28 00:00:20 10390kN 3.Rf1 Rxd4 -+ (-2.50) Depth: 14/31 00:00:55 28160kN 3.Rf1 Rxd4 -+ (-2.53) Depth: 15/32 00:02:50 89091kN 3.Rf1 Rxd4 4.Re4 Rxe4 5.Bxe4 Rb3 6.g3 Be5 7.Bd5 Rxa3 8.Kg2 Kg7 -+ (-2.62) Depth: 16/36 00:07:26 238627kN (Pascutto, Gent 10.11.2001) Qe5 Bc2 Bxc2 Qxc2 Rxd4 New game [D]r5k1/1R3p2/p5pp/2P1q3/2Pr1b2/P7/2Q2PPP/3R2K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 7: 4.g3 Qf5 5.Qa4 Rxd1+ 6.Qxd1 Be5 -+ (-2.12) Depth: 8/20 00:00:00 228kN 4.g3 Bg5 -+ (-1.84) Depth: 9/23 00:00:01 911kN 4.g3-- -+ (-2.12) Depth: 10/26 00:00:04 1910kN 4.g3 Rad8 -+ (-2.15) Depth: 10/27 00:00:04 2157kN 4.g3 Rad8 -+ (-2.34) Depth: 11/30 00:00:09 4746kN 4.g3-- -+ (-2.62) Depth: 12/30 00:00:19 9642kN 4.g3 Rad8 -+ (-2.65) Depth: 12/34 00:00:24 12238kN 4.g3-- -+ (-2.93) Depth: 13/33 00:00:50 24778kN 4.g3 Rad8 5.Rf1 Rd2 6.Qb1 Be3 7.Qxg6+ fxg6 -+ (-2.96) Depth: 13/33 00:01:01 30794kN 4.g3 Rad8 -+ (-3.00) Depth: 14/35 00:03:24 103520kN (Pascutto, Gent 10.11.2001) -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.