Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 05:36:35 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 03:19:27, José Carlos wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 02:29:10, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On November 10, 2001 at 02:01:07, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 2001 at 23:26:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On November 09, 2001 at 20:28:45, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 09, 2001 at 19:56:34, Thomas Mayer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Yet again , a late night post :=) >>>>> >>>>>>Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>in winboard forum one has posted some games of Palm Tiger against not so strong >>>>>>winboard engines. >>>>> >>>>>"One" answers :) >>>>> >>>>>>Next is interesting: >>>>>> >>>>>>[Event "Palm Tiger vs. WinBoard"] >>>>>>[Site "Athlon 1333 vs. Palm Vx"] >>>>>>[Date "2001.11.08"] >>>>>>[Round "-"] >>>>>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.6"] >>>>>>[Black "Grizzly 1.31"] >>>>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>>>>[TimeControl "900"] >>>>>> >>>>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Bxc6 dxc6 5. d4 exd4 6. Qxd4 Bg4 7. Qxd8+ >>>>>>Rxd8 8. Nc3 Bb4 9. Bg5 Bxc3+ 10. bxc3 f6 11. Bf4 Bxf3 12. gxf3 Rd7 13. h4 >>>>>>Ne7 14. h5 b6 15. Rd1 Nc8 16. Rxd7 Kxd7 17. Rg1 Rg8 18. Ke2 Nd6 19. Bh6 g5 >>>>>>20. hxg6 hxg6 21. Bf4 g5 22. Kd3 Rd8 23. Bh2 Nb5 24. f4 Kc8+ 25. Ke3 gxf4+ >>>>>>26. Bxf4 Nxc3 27. Rg7 Rd7 28. Rg8+ Kb7 29. f3 Nxa2 30. Rf8 Nb4 31. c4 Nc2+ >>>>>>32. Ke2 f5 33. exf5 b5 34. cxb5 cxb5 35. f6 Nd4+ 36. Ke3 Ne6 37. Re8 Nxf4 >>>>>>38. Kxf4 b4 39. Re4 a5 40. Re5 Kb6 41. Re7 Rd8 42. f7 Rf8 43. Kf5 b3 44. >>>>>>Kf6 b2 45. Re1 a4 46. Ke7 Rxf7+ 47. Kxf7 a3 48. Rb1 c5 49. f4 c4 50. f5 c3 >>>>>>51. Re1 c2 52. Re6+ Kc5 53. Re5+ Kd4 54. Ra5 c1=Q 55. Rxa3 b1=Q 56. Ra4+ >>>>>>Ke3 57. Ra7 Qxf5+ 58. Kg7 Qc3+ 59. Kg8 Qcc8+ 60. Kg7 Qcf8# >>>>>>{Black mates} 0-1 >>>>>> >>>>>>[Event "Palm Tiger vs. WinBoard"] >>>>>>[Site "Athlon 1333 vs. Palm Vx"] >>>>>>[Date "2001.11.08"] >>>>>>[Round "-"] >>>>>>[White "Grizzly 1.31"] >>>>>>[Black "Chess Tiger 14.6"] >>>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>>[TimeControl "900"] >>>>>> >>>>>>1. f4 d5 2. Nf3 Bg4 3. g3 Bxf3 4. exf3 e6 5. Ke2 d4 6. Bg2 d3+ 7. cxd3 Nc6 >>>>>>8. Re1 Qd7 9. Kf1 Nb4 10. d4 Nd3 11. Re3 Qxd4 12. Qc2 Nxc1 13. Qxc1 Nf6 14. >>>>>>Nc3 O-O-O 15. Nb5 Qd7 16. a4 a6 17. Nxc7 Kb8 18. Nxa6+ bxa6 19. Qc4 Qc8 20. >>>>>>Rc1 Qxc4+ 21. Rxc4 Nd5 22. Rb3+ Ka7 23. f5 Bd6 24. f4 Rc8 25. Rxc8 Rxc8 26. >>>>>>Rd3 Rc1+ 27. Ke2 Be7 28. fxe6 fxe6 29. f5 Nc7 30. Rd7 Bb4 31. fxe6 Rc5 32. >>>>>>d4 Rc2+ 33. Kd3 Rd2+ 34. Ke3 Kb6 35. e7 Rxg2 36. Rxc7 Bxe7 37. Rxe7 Rxb2 >>>>>>38. h4 Rb3+ 39. Kf2 Ra3 40. Rxg7 Rxa4 41. Ke3 h5 42. Rg5 Ra3+ 43. Kf4 Rd3 >>>>>>44. d5 a5 45. Ke4 Rb3 46. d6 a4 47. Rd5 Rxg3 48. d7 Rg4+ 49. Kf5 Rg8 50. >>>>>>d8=Q+ Rxd8 51. Rxd8 Kc7 52. Ra8 Kc6 53. Rxa4 Kb5 54. Ra8 Kc6 55. Rh8 Kd5 >>>>>>56. Rxh5 Kd4 57. Rg5 Kd5 58. h5 Kc4 59. h6 Kb3 60. h7 Ka2 61. Rg3 Ka1 62. >>>>>>h8=Q+ Kb1 63. Rg2 Kc1 64. Qa1# >>>>>>{White mates} 1-0 >>>>>> >>>>>>[Event "Palm Tiger vs. WinBoard"] >>>>>>[Site "Athlon 1333 vs. Palm Vx"] >>>>>>[Date "2001.11.08"] >>>>>>[Round "-"] >>>>>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.6"] >>>>>>[Black "Grizzly 1.31"] >>>>>>[Result "0-1"] >>>>>>[TimeControl "900"] >>>>>> >>>>>>1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 dxc4 4. e3 b5 5. Nc3 Bb4 6. a3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 Nf6 >>>>>>8. Ne5 O-O 9. a4 c6 10. Qf3 Qd5 11. Ba3 Qxf3 12. gxf3 Re8 13. Bd6 a6 14. >>>>>>Bxb8 Rxb8 15. Nxc6 Rb6 16. axb5 axb5 17. Nb4 Nd5 18. Nxd5 exd5 19. f4 b4 >>>>>>20. cxb4 Rxb4 21. Bg2 Bb7 22. O-O Ra8 23. Rab1 Rxb1 24. Rxb1 c3 25. Rxb7 c2 >>>>>>26. Rc7 Ra1+ 27. Bf1 c1=Q 28. Rxc1 Rxc1 29. Kg2 f5 30. Bb5 Kf7 31. Kf3 Ke6 >>>>>>32. Be8 Rh1 33. Kg2 Rb1 34. Kf3 g6 35. h3 Rb4 36. Bc6 Kd6 37. Be8 Rb8 38. >>>>>>Ba4 Rb1 39. Be8 Rh1 40. Kg2 Rc1 41. Kg3 Ke7 42. Bb5 Rg1+ 43. Kf3 Ke6 44. >>>>>>Bc6 Rh1 45. Kg3 Rc1 46. Bb7 Rg1+ 47. Kf3 Kd6 48. Ba6 Rh1 49. Kg3 Ra1 50. >>>>>>Bb7 h6 51. Kf3 Ra5 52. Bc8 Ra7 53. Kg3 Kc6 54. Be6 Rc7 55. e4 dxe4 56. Kh4 >>>>>>Kd6 57. Bb3 Ke7 58. Bg8 Rc3 59. d5 Kf6 60. f3 Rxf3 61. Be6 g5+ 62. fxg5+ >>>>>>hxg5+ 63. Kh5 Rxh3# >>>>>>{Black mates} 0-1 >>>>>> >>>>>>In most rating lists, Grizzly is around 1800-1900 - this new version is a little >>>>>>bit stronger, but I doubt that it is over 2000. Does this mean that Chess Tiger >>>>>>on Palm is also clearly under 2000 ? >>>>> >>>>>Both, the second and the third game were quite interesting and very close. >>>>>Grizzly is no weaky - I was very much impressed by the Tiger performance here ! >>>>>Still Grizzly won ; is Zephyr weak ? Or Blikskottel ? What was their score ? I >>>>>wanted to have a little fun ; beating the Tiger on the 1000* hardware shows that >>>>>there has been some "magic" barrier passed - only Grizzly succeeded. >>>>> >>>>>Or is this another point where >>>>>>engine-engine matches are very different to engine - human matches ? Anyway, I >>>>>>would like to see some more matches of Chess Tiger on Palm against the lower >>>>>>edge of the winboard-engines... And besides that, frequently here are some >>>>>>postings of games ChessTiger on Palm against some well known dedicated chess >>>>>>computers which are listed on the SSDF-list. ChessTiger wins many games, does >>>>>>that mean that those old irons are still overestimated on the SSDF-list. Or >>>>>>should we finally stop to compare SSDF-ELO with human ELO ? (Which I say for a >>>>>>long time now - there is no real comparrison... The 100 ELO-penalty for the hole >>>>>>list was somehow irregular because the old iron often have showed there strength >>>>>>against humans, so why decrease them 100 ELOs ?) >>>>>> >>>>>>Greets, Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>>P.S.: I think a solution for the SSDF would be a completely different rating. >>>>>>Just stop to make them compareable with human rating and set a starting level >>>>>>for the lowest listed engine of e.g. 0 or e.g. 10000 so just the numbers are >>>>>>very different to FIDE-ELO and noone would compare anymore. >>>>> >>>>>Well - it's too early for any conclusion IMHO . My personal guess is that the >>>>>Palm Tiger is about the same strength as the Novag Diamond/Sapphire. When it is >>>>>about the WinBoard engines being able to beat the Tiger even if on some insane >>>>>Athlon 1300++ against some miserable Palm Vx - seems to be some _real_ challenge >>>>>still , huh ? >>>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>pete >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>I think another real challenge is to write a 1800 elo program for the Athlon >>>>1333. >>>> >>>>I think that by just using plain vanilla brute force alpha beta without >>>>transposition table nor null move and a static piece square table you are >>>>already above 1800 elo. Easily. >>>> >>>>Actually the Sargon III program does just that, and on an Athlon it must be well >>>>over 2100 elo (maybe 2200). >>> >>> >>>I doubt it >>>Do you say that SargonIII does not evaluate passed pawns?(you cannot evaluate >>>passed pawns only by piece square table evaluation). >>> >>> >>>I believe that if you use only alpha beta without evaluation that has only >>>material and piece square table and use no qsearch then you can get program that >>>is even weaker than 1800 on Athlon1333. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >> >>Maybe. But just following the basic published algorithms of alphabeta+QSearch >>brings you well over 1800 in no time. > > Don't forget there's some point in the life of a programmer when (s)he begins. >The first time you read about alfabeta and qsearch and you decide to write a >small chess program, you write something that won't play well in any hardware, >because of it's braching factor, simple eval, bugs... > Nowadays, programmers share their engines in a very early stage of >developement. This is great, because weak human players can find a variety of >weak chess programs to play with. > I don't know haw strong is Grizzly, but shouldn't be surpresed that there're a >lot of programs that will perform below 1800 fide in a fast machine. And those >programmers are not stupid at all, they're learning. Naturally they are not stupid. I went through this process myself not so long ago. But even at the time I was using a 386, my program has quickly been able to beat me. > Also, most amateur programmers have very little time to work on their engines. >In my case, about a couple of hours per week. The fact that the engine is able to run flawlessly under Winboard for long enough to get a rating already shows that a good deal of debugging has been done on it. >>I don't think Sargon III had any second order evaluation of passed pawns. >> >>And I know you can go easily above 1800 elo with a piece square table only >>evaluation. I know it sounds surprising, but that tells something about the >>"essence" of chess. > > You're thinking from your experienced point of view. But there was a time when >you were a beginner too :) And I remember this time very well. I was using 286s and 386s at that time. On a hardware that is between 500 and 1000 times faster, any program is approx. 200 elo points stronger... Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.