Author: Drazen Marovic
Date: 05:40:42 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 04:24:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 04:11:11, Drazen Marovic wrote: > >>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.o-o Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.c3 d5 9.exd >>Nxd5 10.Nxe5 Nxe5 11.Rxe5 Nf6(?!)12d4 Bd6 13.Re1 Ng5 14.h3 Nxf2 15.Kxf2?? >>Correct is 15.Qf3! tiger after more than 600 seconds in analysis mode on palm Vx >>overclocked to 1.12 tiger marks holds steady with 15.Kxf2?? Tiger on pc sees >>Qf3 almost instantly, in fact all top programs see it almost instantly. >> >>can someone tell me if their tiger on palm plays differently? >> >> >>On November 10, 2001 at 03:31:58, Drazen Marovic wrote: >> >>>1.e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nd4 It takes Tiger 100seconds in analysis mode before >>>it sees that Nxe5 is not correct Tiger mark 1.12(does anyone know how to clock >>>it faster?). It does seem to be playing a little better on the whole now that >>>it is overclocked up to 1.12 > > > >[D]r1bqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/2BnP3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQK2R w KQkq - 0 4 > >avoid 4.Nxe5 > > >[D]r1bq1rk1/2p2ppp/p2b4/1p6/3P4/1BP4P/PP3nP1/RNBQR1K1 w - - 0 15 > >avoid 15.Kxf2 > >Position #2 after 15,000 seconds! in analysis mode Tiger on palm Vx held steady with Kf2? It seems if speed was the only difference that tiger would eventualy have played Qf3 just as it does on my desktop?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.