Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 07:55:52 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Thorsten, >ok - you come with games : very fast PC, more >than 83 times faster, and want to estimate a rating. >i do it different. >we have then vancouver 68020 and the diamond 2 and very precise >ratings of them. >as far as i have played out the GAMBIT version of tiger14.6 for palm >beats them. well, but let the vancouver play against some engines on Athlon 1333. What do you think will happen ? Do you think the vancouver will get the rating the rating that it has on the SSDF list ? I doubt that. So the main point is: Rating lists with big hardware difference get extremely out of sync... As I have said, I don't see any reason why e.g. the vancouver get's weaker in the last some years ? Do you see any ? By the way, many of those old dedicated chess computers have proven their rating against humans, so it was a little unfair to them to reduce their rating by 100 points... As long as anyone claims that SSDF shows ratings compareable to human ratings... Agreed ? Greets, Thomas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.