Author: Andrew Smith
Date: 08:47:58 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 10:25:59, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 09:49:09, Andrew Smith wrote: > >diep solves it pretty fast nowadays. Depends basically upon extensions >and hardware used what time it takes. But nearly always more than 10 minutes, >but usual also between the hour. > >I see you get half a million nodes or so with tiger in this pos. >what's your hardware? I was running it on my old and slow 333mhz.. >>[D]r1b1kb1r/1p1n1ppp/p2ppn2/6BB/2qNP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R2Q1RK1 w KQkq - 0 1 >> >>This looks to be one of the harder Nolot tests IMO (but far from the hardest I >>think). I'm interested what chess programs can solve it, and how fast they have >>done it. If you have a chess engine that can solve this one, please post the >>analysis. Here is what I got when I let gambit 2.0 run over night >> >>only,T - Gambit Tiger 2.0 >>r1b1kb1r/1p1n1ppp/p2ppn2/6BB/2qNP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R2Q1RK1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: >> >>1.Be3 e5 2.Nb3 Nxe4 3.Nd2 Nxd2 4.Qxd2 >> ² (0.52) Depth: 5 00:00:00 21kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bc1 Qc7 3.Be3 >> ± (0.72) Depth: 5 00:00:00 22kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.Qd3 Nc5 3.Qf3 >> ± (1.00) Depth: 5 00:00:00 29kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.Qd2 b5 3.Bf3 Bb7 >> ± (1.02) Depth: 6 00:00:01 39kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.Qd2 b5 3.a3 Bb7 4.f3 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 7 00:00:02 93kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bh4 Ne5 3.Bxf6 gxf6 4.Be2 Qc7 >> ± (0.72) Depth: 7 00:00:03 139kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bh4 g5 3.Bg3 Ne5 4.Re1 Nxf3+ 5.Nxf3 Qc6 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 8 00:00:04 211kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.a4 h6 3.Be3 Ne5 4.Qd2 Nc4 5.Bxc4 Qxc4 >> ² (0.68) Depth: 8 00:00:06 292kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.a4 h6 3.Be3 Nc5 4.f3 Qb6 5.Ra2 >> ² (0.62) Depth: 9 00:00:13 620kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bh4 g5 3.Bg3 Ne5 4.Re1 Nxf3+ 5.Nxf3 Qc6 6.Nd4 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 9 00:00:15 717kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bh4 g5 3.Bg3 Ne5 4.Be2 Qb4 5.f4 gxf4 6.Rxf4 Qxb2 7.Rxf6 Qxc3 >> ² (0.54) Depth: 10 00:00:23 1133kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.a4 h6 3.Bh4 b6 4.Bh5 g6 5.Bf3 Bg7 >> ² (0.60) Depth: 10 00:00:32 1582kN >>1.Be2 Qc7 2.Bf3 h6 3.Bh4 Ne5 4.Bxf6 gxf6 5.a3 Bd7 6.Qd2 Nxf3+ 7.Nxf3 >> ² (0.52) Depth: 11 00:01:14 3691kN >>1.Bf3 h6 2.Bh4 g5 3.Bg3 Ne5 4.Be2 Qb4 5.a3 Qb6 6.Na4 >> ± (0.72) Depth: 11 00:01:42 5138kN >>1.Bf3 Ne5 2.Be2 Qc7 3.Qd2 b5 4.Bxf6 gxf6 5.Bh5 Bg7 6.Nce2 Kf8 7.a4 >> ² (0.70) Depth: 12 00:03:34 10941kN >>1.Bf3 Qc7 2.Qd2 Ne5 3.Be2 b5 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 13 00:08:35 27318kN >>1.Bf3 Qc7 2.Qd2 Ne5 3.Be2 b5 4.Bxf6 gxf6 5.Bh5 Qc5 6.Nb3 Nc4 7.Nxc5 Nxd2 8.Rfd1 >>dxc5 9.Rxd2 >> ² (0.64) Depth: 14 00:21:54 72996kN >>1.Bf3 Qc7 2.Qd2 Ne5 3.Be2 b5 4.Bxf6 gxf6 5.Bh5 Bg7 6.a4 b4 7.Nce2 Rb8 8.Qf4 Qe7 >> ² (0.56) Depth: 15 00:48:38 161410kN >>1.Bf3 Qc7 2.a4 Be7 3.Be3 Kf8 4.Nb3 Ne5 5.Be2 b6 6.a5 b5 7.Bb6 Qd7 8.Qd4 Bb7 >> ² (0.52) Depth: 16 01:46:44 405761kN >>1.Bf3 Qc7 2.a4 Be7 3.a5 Ne5 4.Be2 Bd7 5.Bf4 Nc4 6.Bxc4 Qxc4 7.Bg3 Kf8 8.Re1 d5 >>9.exd5 Nxd5 10.Ne4 >> ² (0.50) Depth: 17 03:59:02 967664kN >>1.Nxe6 Qxe6 2.Nd5 Kd8 3.Bg4 Qe5 4.f4 Qxb2 5.Bxd7 Bxd7 6.Rb1 Qa3 7.Nxf6 Qc5+ >>8.Rf2 Bb5 9.Nxh7+ Be7 >> ± (0.85) Depth: 17 06:19:46 1711999kN >>1.Nxe6 Qxe6 2.Nd5 Kd8 3.Bg4 Qe5 4.f4 Qxb2 5.Bxd7 Bxd7 6.Rb1 Qa3 7.Nxf6 Qc5+ >>8.Rf2 Bb5 9.Nxh7+ Be7 >> ± (0.88) Depth: 18 08:13:15 2317671kN
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.