Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:02:15 11/10/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 2001 at 11:24:52, Frank Phillips wrote: >On November 10, 2001 at 10:17:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> >>You can do like the Nimzo guys did. Just set up 4 loops (for 4 piece >>endings) and use each subscript to stick a piece on that square. Probe the >>EGTB and if you get a score >0 store "mate", =0, store "draw" and <0 store >>"mated". Only probe these beyond the first N plies of the search so that >>you get real mate scores early, just win/lose/draw deep in the search. If >>you do this for _all_ 4 piece files, you are going to end up with 40-50 megs >>of stuff. To shrink this they didn't do all tables... > > >Thanks: worth a try. 40-50MB RAM is certainly tolerable now. > >Frank Actually it may be bigger. 200mb is the size of the compressed tables. The real tables are about 600-700M. Which means you might need 150-200M for the win/lose/draw stuff. Unless you store the w/l/d stuff compressed as well....
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.